COMP 411/511: Principles of Programming Languages
COMP 411/511 Principles of Programming Languages (Spring 2019)
Professor Robert "Corky" Cartwright
Department of Computer Science
Rice University
Houston, Texas, USA
Note the new classroom!
Spring 2019: Room 1070, Duncan Hall, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 11:00am–11:50am
For more information on the course staff including office hours, see course information.
Course News
Summary
COMP 411/511 is an introduction to the principles of programming languages. It focuses on:
- identifying the conceptual building blocks from which lanugages are assembled and
- specifying the semantics, including common type systems, of programming languages.
In the lecture materials, interpreters are written in concise functional notation using Scheme (Racket).
In some cases, supplementary material showing
how the same interpreters can be written in Scala (using explicit typing) are provided. The functional subset of Scala and the ML family of languages
(notably OCaml) are very well-suited to writing purely functional interpreters, yet they support the limited use of mutation (imperativity)
as well. I personally dislike the ML family of languages for writing larger software systems because they do not support inheritance and object-oriented design.
In conrast, Java is a very good vehicle for implementing these interpreters including the disciplined use of imperative code to greatly improve program
efficiency. On the other hand, it is not a good
representation for explaining abstract concepts because it is much too wordy and
the OO structure obscures the simple algebraic structure of abstract syntax and structural recursion used in simple
interpreters. For this reason, we will present sample code in lecture in mostly functional Scheme/Racket. If you have not seen Scheme/Racket before, you will need
to learn the core constructs of this language family which is widely imitated in many domain specific languages (DSLs) embedded in applications, such as Emacs
Lisp embedded in Gnu Emacs.
A secondary theme of this course is software engineering. All of the programming assignments in this course are conducted in Java using test-driven development and pair-programming, two of the major tenets of Extreme Programming. A compelling reason for using Java is that it is widely used for software development in industry and it supports low-level programming where appropriate. Java Virtual Machines are expensive to start (the Achilles heel of Java IMO) and Java applications are commpiled "Just In Time" (JIT) which has visible costs early in program execution. On the other hand, well-written Java code that has been "warmed up" (run on sufficient inputs to force the JIT compilation of all of the compute intensive parts of the application) is surprisingly fast.
COMP 411/511 consists of three parts:
- The first part focuses on specifying the syntax and the
semantics of programming languages. The former is introduced via
simple parsing (translations) of program text into abstract
syntax. More detailed aspects of parsing (such as lexical analysis and advanced parsing
methods) are left to COMP 412, a
course on compilers. In practice, most domain specific languages do not need
a sophisticated parser; in fact, so-called "internal DSLs" rely on the parser and
compiler of the host language. Scala, a putative successor to Java that compiles
to Java byte code, is specfically designed to support the easy implementation of
internal DSLs. In addition, "external DSLs" (which are implemented by interpreters
akin to the interpreter projects assigned in this course) often rely on
simple manually written parsers based on "recursive descent" which is the approach
to writing parsers taught in this course. The other attractive option for parsing
external DSLs is to use a parser generator like ANTLR which is based on a simple
extension of recursive descent parsing.
In the course, you will implements the semantics of a comprehensive collection
of programming language constructs using mostly functional
interpreters derived from simple reduction (textual rewriting) semantics for the constructs. The constructs include
arithmetical and conditional expressions, lexical binding of
variables, blocks, first-class functions, assignment and
mutuation, basic control constructs (loop exits, first-class
continuations, simple threads), and dynamic dispatch.
- The second part illustrates how interpreters and reduction
semantics can be used to analyze important behaviorial properties of
programming languages. Two examples are covered: type safety and
memory safety. Type safety guarantees that programs respect
syntactically defined type abstraction boundaries and never
raise certain classes of error signals. Memory safety guarantees
that programs release memory if it is provably useless for the
remainder of the evaluation. The standard technique for
ensuring memory safety is automatic storage management, which
is typically implemented using reference counting or garbage collection.
Automatic storage management (which is present in all high-level
programming languages including Java, Python, Javascript, and Swift)
never deletes
data objects that are reachable in subsequent program execution.
Type safety typically depends on
memory safety. We will study the formal type-checking process
incorporated in the ML family of languages, which has been adopted
in part by sophisticated OO languages like Scala and Swift.
- The third part shows how interpreters can systematically be
transformed so that they use fewer and fewer language
facilities. The key transformations are the explicit
representation of closures as records and the conversion of
program control flow to continuation-passing style. Using these
transformations, a recursive interpreter can readily be be
re-written in a low-level language like C/C++ or even assembly
language. These transformations can be applied both to
interpreters and to arbitrary programs. If we apply these
transformations to an interpreter, the result is a low-level
interpreter that is easily implemented in machine code. The
process of applying these transformations to arbitrary input
programs yields a high-level description of program compilation,
a process which is explored in more detail in COMP 412.
This course material enables students to analyze the semantics
and pragmatics of the old, new, and future programming languages
that they are likely to encounter in the workplace (e.g., C,
C++, Java, JavaScript, Swift, C#, Python). It also enables
students to design and implement efficient interpreters for new
languages or DSLs embeded in software applications. Most
importantly, it equips students to become master software
developers because they will be able to define and implement
whatever linguistic extensions are appropriate for simplifying
the construction of a particular software system.
My notes on object-oriented
program design briefly describe the design patterns that I
recommend using to express functional programming abstractions
in Java. If you have little prior experience in writing
functional programming code in Java, I highly recommend skimming
them.
For students interested in operational (syntax-based) semantics,
I recommend reading notes by
Walid Taha (now at Halmstad University in Sweden) on
big-step versus small-step semantics. I strongly prefer
small-step semantics, so it is the only form of operational
semantics that we will use in this class, but big-step semantics
is often used in the programming languages literature.
Differences between COMP 411 and COMP 511
COMP 511 includes all of the material from COMP 411 plus a modest amount of supplemental material.
Portions of projects 3 and 6 are mandatory for Comp 511 students but optional for 411 students,
COMP 511 students are also required to complete 3 short written assignments
over the course of the semester, discussing concepts from the lectures.
More Course Information
Please take a look at the course information/policies page,
which is referenced in the first few class lectures.
Course Schedule
#
|
Date
|
Day
|
Topic
|
Reference
|
Assignment
|
1
|
1/07
|
M
|
Information &
Motivation
|
|
|
2
|
1/09
|
W
|
Parsing
|
Web site describing Syntax Diagrams
Note: EBNF notation is explained in Project 1.
Component Pascal Syntax Diagrams
Tutorial on Context Free Grammars
The Java Language Specification
|
3
|
1/11
|
F
|
Project 1 assigned, 1/11
|
4
|
1/14
|
M
|
The Scope of Variables
|
PLAI, ch. 3-4
|
|
5
|
1/16
|
W
|
Syntactic Interpreters
|
6
|
1/18
|
F
|
Brief Review of Lectures 1-6
|
|
1/21
|
M
|
Martin Luther King Holiday
|
|
|
7
|
1/23
|
W
|
A Meta Interpreter for LC
Eliminating Meta-errors
|
PLAI, Ch. 4-6
|
Project 1 due at noon, 1/23
Project 2 assigned, 1/23
Reference: Notes on Object-Oriented Program Design
|
8
|
1/25
|
F
|
|
9
|
1/28
|
M
|
10
|
1/30
|
W
|
Data Domains Supporting Recursive Definitions
Recursive Definitions and Environments
|
Domain Theory: An Introduction
The Why of Y
Recursive Programs as Definitions in First-Order Logic
Types as Intervals
The Lambda Calculus as a Model of Computation
Supplemental Material
|
11
|
2/1
|
F
|
12
|
2/4
|
M
|
13
|
2/6
|
W
|
Recursive Binding
|
Project 2 due 11am, 2/6
Project 3 assigned, 2/6
|
|
2/8
|
F
|
Spring Recess
|
|
|
14
|
2/11
|
M
|
Eliminating Binding (lambda)
|
Essentials, ch. 3.7, 3.9
Hand Evaluation Exercises
Solution to Hand Evaluation Exercises
|
|
15
|
2/13
|
W
|
Assignment and Mutability
|
16
|
2/15
|
F
|
16 (cont.)
|
2/18
|
M
|
17
|
2/20
|
W
|
Run-time Environment Representation and Control
|
Essentials, ch. 7, 8
Powerpoint slides taken from Sebesta's book Concepts of Programming Languages
|
Project 3 due 11am, 2/20
Project 4 and 4xc assigned, 2/20
Comp 511 Written Assignment 1, assigned 2/20
|
18
|
2/22
|
F
|
|
2/25
|
M
|
19
|
2/27
|
W
|
Object-Oriented Languages
|
Essentials, ch. 5
|
|
Midterm Review
|
3/1
|
F
|
Sample Midterm Exam
Solutions to Problems 1, 2, 4, 6
Solution to Problem 3
Solution to Problem 5(i)
Solution to Problem 5(ii)
|
Essentials, ch. 3.8
|
Comp 511 Written Assignment 1, due 11:59pm 3/1
|
3/4
|
M
|
|
3/5
|
Tu
|
Mid-term Examination 7-10pm in McMurtry Auditorium in Duncan Hall
|
|
|
20
|
3/6
|
W
|
What Is a Type?
Types and Safety
Types and Datatype
|
Essentials, ch. 4
Essentials, ch. 6
Type Inference Study Guide
|
Project 4 due 11am, 3/6
Project 5 and 5xc assigned, 3/6
|
21
|
3/8
|
F
|
|
|
|
|
3/11-3/15
|
M-F
|
Spring Break — No Classes
|
|
|
22
|
3/18
|
M
|
Polymorphism
Implicit Polymorphism
Survey of Unification
|
Draft Racket program that performs unification inefficiently
|
|
22a,
23
|
3/20
|
W
|
Final Words on Types
|
|
Project 4xc due 11am, 3/20.
Comp 511 Written Assignment 2, assigned 3/20
|
24
|
3/22
|
F
|
Meaning of Function Calls
|
Essentials, ch. 7-8
|
Due date for Project 5 and 5xc postponed to 3/27
Project 6 assigned, 3/22
|
25
|
3/25
|
M
|
Continuation-Passing Style
|
26
|
3/27
|
W
|
Explaining letcc and error
|
Project 5 and 5xc due 11am 3/27
|
27
|
3/29
|
F
|
|
|
28
|
4/1
|
M
|
|
Dynamic Storage Allocation Survey
|
Comp 511 Written Assignment 2, due 11:59pm 4/1
|
29
|
4/3
|
W
|
Garbage Collection
|
Uniprocessor Garbage Collection Techniques
|
|
4/5
|
F
|
|
4/8
|
M
|
Comp 511 Written Assignment 3, assigned 4/8
Project 6 due 11am 4/8
Project 7 assigned, 4/8
|
30
|
4/10
|
W
|
|
4/12
|
F
|
Sample Final Exam
Sample Final Exam With Solutions
Bonus Material (TBA)
|
|
|
|
4/15
|
M
|
|
4/17
|
W
|
|
4/19
|
F
|
Project 7 due 11:59pm 4/19
Comp 511 Written Assignment 3, due 11:59pm 4/19
|
Language Resources
- Java
-
SDK Download
-
API Reference
-
DrJava Programming Environment
-
Elements of Object-Oriented Program Design by Prof. Cartwright
- Scheme (Racket)
-
How to Design Programs
-
DrRacket Programming Environment
- Browser-based reference Jam interpreter
Additional References
- Krishamurthi, Shriram. Programming Languages: Application and Interpretation.
This book is a descendant of lecture notes created by Shriram for a version of this course when Shriram was a teaching assistant over a decade
ago.
- Friedman, Wand, and Haynes, Essentials of Programming Languages, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, 2001)
You can take a look at the following two chapters, which the authors prepared for the second edition, without buying the book:
-
Parameter Passing ( local file, PDF)
-
Types and Type Inference ( local file, PDF)
-
Evaluation rules for functional Scheme ( PDF)
-
References on evaluating Jam programs
-
Lecture Notes on Types I
-
Lecture Notes on Types II
-
Introduction to System F (Polymorphic Lambda-Calculus)
-
Scheme code from Class Lectures
-
The Essence of Compiling with Continuations by Flanagan et al.
-
Uniprocessor Garbage Collection Techniques by Paul Wilson
-
Garbage Collection [canonical textbook] by Jones and Lins
-
Space Efficient Conservative Garbage Collection by Hans Boehm ( local file, PDF)
- Hans Boehm's Conservative GC Webpage
-
JVM Performance Optimization.
The first article in a five part series (with the remaining four parts linked from the first article) on JVM internals and how to write Java source code to use them
efficiently.
-
Java Memory Model
-
Revised Thread Synchronization Policies in DrJava (doc) ( pdf). Since DrJava is built using the Java Swing library, it must conform to the synchronization policies for Swing. Unfortunately, the official Swing documentation is sparse and misleading in places, so this document includes a discussion of the Swing synchronization policies.
-
Lesson: Concurrency in Swing. This lesson discusses concurrency as it applies to Swing programming. It assumes that you are already familiar with the content of the Concurrency lesson in the Essential Classes trail.
-
Java concurrency (multi-threading): Tutorial. A tutorial on expressing concurrent computation in Java using threads.
-
The Last Word in Swing Threads. An article on the perils of
accessing Swing components from outside the event dispatch thread.
-
Why Functional Programming Matters (as analyzed in 1990).
-
Why Functional Programming Mattered (gazing at programming technology in 2017).
-
Old Course Website
Accomodations for Students with Special Needs
Students with disabilities are encouraged to contact me during the first two weeks of class regarding any special needs. Students with disabilities should also contact Disabled Student Services in the Ley Student Center and the Rice Disability Support Services.